First, a few links:
“Russian Church Stands against Human Rights”, Komersant (June 23)
“The Russian Orthodox Church refines its human rights conception in the run-up to the Bishops Council”, Russian Orthodox Representation to the European Institutions (June 23)
“Metropolitan Kirill: Caution of many Orthodox Christians speaking of human rights is justified”, Russian Orthodox Representation to the European Insitutions (June 29)
(There must be some apology for the quality of the translation of those last two; French versions are also available on their website.)
In the West, there are those among traditional Christians who long for a return to pre-modern naivete regarding the existence of God. (I’m going to be summoning up Charles Taylor here, to a degree.) They want to return to an order of things were belief in God is an unchallengable default; in a lot of ways, this is appealing when compared to modern and post-modern despair regarding the place of the human being within the world. Liberals influenced by post-modernism’s interior critique have taken this idea in a different angle: Traditional societies have a right to protect themselves from this modern disassociation (this is the intellectual current behind many defenses of Islamic terrorism). In the case of Russia, however, talking about human rights as allowing for behaviors that could undo society is rather like protesting once the cat is out of the bag. While certain aspects of public morality were still tightly controlled under the USSR, in every other way, the Russians have already been down the modern path much farther than most other peoples.
It must be remembered, however, that the “human rights” discussed here include things Americans take for granted. When we discusss, in this country, drawing a line in the sand over individual autonomy, it is usually over societal questions such as homosexual marriage or abortion. While the reaction against the Enlightenment has produced some persons here who wish the whole language of human rights and liberties would disappear altogether, this is still a small minority. While the plural of anecdote is not data, I do find it very interesting that I have seen more Ron Paul bumper stickers in Orthodox parish parking lots than those for all other candidates combined (yes, I do keep running counts), placing them in somewhat the opposite direction. And, in the interest of full-disclosure, while I’m not the bumper-sticker type, I also supported Dr. Paul’s candidacy.
I suppose what I’m asking for here is a discussion: Where should Christianity draw lines over how much freedom we believe that governments should grant persons?
No Comments
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.